Mikael Abrahamsson <[email protected]> wrote: >> > - Homenet-hncp intends to be incremental in terms of TLVs. Other >> TLVs > will come, and, if hncp is widely used in homes, >> vendor-specific > options will come as well. So I think ‘ignore TLVs >> you don’t know’ is > the correct behavior. Nevertheless, I understand >> hncp could be used >> >> We actually need a "critical" bit on the Type value then.
> Or some kind of "feature election" within the home? Just the way HNCP
> now has a kind of voting system for which IGP to choose (which might go
That's a higher level concept than understanding whether a particular tlv
can be decoded or not.
Or: I am not disagreeing with you, but saying it is an orthogonal issue.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
pgpW0ixm4aTUF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
