Le 16/06/2014 22:18, Gert Doering a écrit :
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:09:34PM +0200, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
Some deployments of IPv6 homenets with multiple IP subnets dont run
routing protocols, but static routing. I've discovered that recently
with much enthusiasm. Maybe it's just a first step, but I havent seen
documented this simple and numerous existing deployments.
This is not a "homenet" as per this architecture document. The key is
"it needs to work for your parents, without you driving over and
setting it up for them".
I suppose parents will likely ask the IPv6 specialists something like this:
- should I click on '6rd' or '6to4' or on 'DHCPv6' or on 'PPPoE'?
- should I click on ULA or not?
- should I click on private addresses or not?
- should I click on Delegate inside when using Delegate from outside,
or not?
- what should I fill in as next-hop address?
- what does "dotted-decimal notation" mean with IPv6 addresses?
(these are examples from existing consumer equipment for in-house)
Little chances are there that parents will ask whether to use BGP or
OSPF or please design a protocol for me. (haven't seen these options on
consumer equipment GUIs).
I know people that have BGP routing with PI space at home, but the fact
that it's "at home" does not make it a *homenet*.
I agree.
Alex
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
