On 20 Jun 2014, at 06:07, Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote: > As Tim mentioned a couple of days ago, there has been some productive > discussion about how to fix the routing section of the architecture document > so that it satisfies the concerns that were raised during IESG review. Ray > Hunter posted a nice list of questions; I've asked him to produce a first > draft of a new version of this section. > > Once that's done, Tim will hold the pen on the text, and I would obviously > appreciate any feedback people can give on it. The text from Ray will be a > starting point, so if it's not what you think it should be, please explain > why and (if appropriate) send text. > > As I mentioned earlier, this will not be open season on the document—the IESG > has already reviewed it, and making substantial changes at this point that > aren't addressing points raised in the IESG review is out of scope. > > Thanks for whatever remaining patience you have to offer on this topic.
draft-ietf-homenet-arch-17.txt, which contains the new text on routing that Ted is referring to below, was published Friday. A diff from -16 is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-homenet-arch-17 This email commences a 2 week last call, ending Wednesday July 23 during the IETF meeting in Toronto. In parallel, we would like to ask Ted to review this new version with which ever members of the IESG he deems necessary for additional review and potential change of ballot position. If the document passes this WG last call as well as any AD review by July 23, we will ask Ted to advance the document before our meeting on Friday, July 25. As with the previous WGLC (albeit that was effectively immediately rendered moot by the WG’s unanimous rejection of the routing text that WGLC is the changes to section 3.5. thanks, Ray and Mark _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
