On 9 Jul 2014, at 16:34, Ray Bellis <[email protected]> wrote:
> As with the previous WGLC (albeit that was effectively immediately rendered > moot by the WG’s unanimous rejection of the routing text that WGLC is the > changes to section 3.5. Sorry, that final paragraph should have read: As with the previous WGLC (albeit that was effectively immediately rendered moot by the WG’s unanimous rejection of the routing text that came from the last IESG review) the only text that is in scope of this WGLC is the changes to section 3.5. Ray _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
