On 7/31/14 9:03 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote: > > It seems to me that you are grasping for a use case to justify a split > > where none is needed. Protocols like OSPF, IS-IS and Babel would all > > work in both environments. RIP won't. So this seems more like an > > argument not to use RIP than an argument to have two different homenet > > router profiles. > > For the record, can you expound on the technical reason why RIP(v2) won't > work? (I'm not a fan of it, but last time I used it was on SunOS 3 or > something)
hop count isn't a great tool for expressing that your gig-e port is a more desireable path if up then the wifi interface. > > > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
