Le 01/08/2014 12:44, Ole Troan a écrit :
It seems to me that you are grasping for a use case to justify a split
where none is needed. Protocols like OSPF, IS-IS and Babel would all
work in both environments. RIP won't. So this seems more like an
argument not to use RIP than an argument to have two different homenet
router profiles.
For the record, can you expound on the technical reason why RIP(v2) won't
work? (I'm not a fan of it, but last time I used it was on SunOS 3 or
something)
hop count isn't a great tool for expressing that your gig-e port is a
more desireable path if up then the wifi interface.
the cost/metric is perfectly fine for that.
assuming a relatively small network diameter.
I think Joël's reluctance about hopcount qualifying the gig-e/wifi
choice may change if considering wifi-ac instead. I.e. hopcount may be
good to qualify a choice between Gigabit Ethernet and Gigabit wifi.
Alex
cheers,
Ole
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
