On 09/14/2014 03:39 PM, Markus Stenberg wrote:
The subject line says “HNCP security”, so I naively thought that’s what this
was about.
Considering security in isolation for single protocol is bit naive, I think,
but I do not mind indulging you.
We're not mind readers here. If you mean security for all aspect of the
homenet, change the
subject line.
And there are plenty examples of "considering security in isolation for
a single protocol" and
I can assure you that it is not "a bit naive".
Just one exchange ago you said ’some magic handwave’ would provide
easy authentication/authorization bootstrap for the routers. I was
hoping you would clarify it.
I said no such thing. And I didn't say we could use leap of faith
"easily", I said
that depending on the threats that it might be an option.
Is that all? Maybe we can recycle security threats from OSPF, etc for a more
comprehensive list?
I am looking forward to your comprehensive list.
How exactly did this turn into a request for guidance on your part, to
an onus for a comprehensive
list on my part?
Mike
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
