On Sep 18, 2014, at 6:46 PM, Mark Baugher <[email protected]> wrote: > The retail model works here. I can imagine a compliant CPE might allow the > use to "take ownership" of an interior HNCP interface. That's only if the > provider of that CPE wanted to be compliant to a future HNCP security > standard.
So to be clear, we are now talking about setting up a system where, with HNCP, routers can be anointed by the manufacturer in a registry that ordinary folks wouldn't have access to. To put it as mildly as possible, I do not support this suggestion: I want home routers to be under the control of the user, not the manufacturer. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
