On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Leddy, John <[email protected]> wrote: > My worry on this topic is that we are referring to ³the Home² and ³the > Enterprise².
I have always approached homenet as a place to get standards that also work for small business. Small business is the place (IMHO) where much of an ipv6 revolution could start to happen. > It isn¹t that clear of a distinction. This isn¹t just a simple L2 flat > home vs. a Fortune 1000 enterprise. +1 > The home is getting more complex and includes work from home; IOT, home > security, hot spots, cloud services, policies, discovery etc. > Large numbers of SMB¹s look like more high end residential than they do > large enterprises. +1 > > It would be ideal to have a solution that spans the range of size and > complexity for both residential and enterprise. > Perhaps enabling features/capabilities where required. > > Also, as far as IPV6 connectivity residential is probably ahead of > enterprises in adopting V6 centric architectures and services. > Residential doesn¹t have much of a choice, it just happens. Comcast's rollout has been quite impressive. Gfiber's also. Others, not so much. > > 2cents, John > > On 10/2/14, 9:15 AM, "Stephen Farrell" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >>On 02/10/14 13:49, Michael Behringer (mbehring) wrote: >>> My personal goal is that what we do in ANIMA is fully compatible with >>> and ideally used in homenet. It would feel wrong to me to have an >>> infrastructure that doesn't work in a homenet. >>> >>> The security bootstrap is a good example of what we can achieve, with >>> reasonable effort. >> >>FWIW, it is not clear to me that the reasonable requirements >>for provisioning device security information (or bootstrapping >>if we wanted to call it that) are the same. >> >>In enterprise environments we see fewer larger vendors of devices. >>In the home where we additionally have a large range of vendors >>many of whom are tiny and leverage a lot of OSS and who could >>perhaps not take part in the kind of provisioning infrastructure >>that is quite reasonable for enterprises and their vendors. >> >>I do think both want to end up in the same state, where devices >>are authorised for connection to the network and where there is >>some keying material usable for security, but I'd be surprised >>if one approach to getting there worked the same way for both >>homes and enterprises. >> >>S. >> >>_______________________________________________ >>homenet mailing list >>[email protected] >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet >> > > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet -- Dave Täht https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/make-wifi-fast _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
