On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:40 PM, James Woodyatt <j...@nestlabs.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> wrote: >> >> >> When we talked about this previously, I think the idea was that when two >> networks with two sets of ULA prefixes merge, you deprecate one of them. >> [...] > > > Naturally, you deprecate one of them, but my concern is that they never > expire if the objective is for a ULA prefix to be invariant. So how many > times can a network join with others before it runs out of space for > deprecated and redundant but unexpired and invariant ULA prefixes? >
2^56 times I think... ... but the network itself would expire long before then. :) What's a more reasonable bound? What's the bound before a given network would collapse from multicast joins alone? > -- > james woodyatt <j...@nestlabs.com> > Nest Labs, Communications Engineering > > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > homenet@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet > -- Dave Täht thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
