On Oct 14, 2014, at 6:05 PM, James Woodyatt <j...@nestlabs.com> wrote: > p2. I do think a locally generated ULA prefix should not be renewed, i.e. it > should be allowed to expire, when there is *any* prefix delegated [GUA or > ULA]. Also when additional locally generated ULA prefixes are present after > a network join. I recognize this view may be in a vocal minority, and I can > live with a more persistent locally-generated ULA prefix so long as there is > a standard scheme for dealing with prefix accumulation after network joins.
Minority versus majority isn't the issue. The reason I object to this is that you have control over the lifetime of your ULA, but not over the lifetime of your GUA. Do we really want a forced flash renumbering from the ISP to break connections on the local network? _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
