On Oct 15, 2014, at 5:57 PM, Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:
> If I use a GUA to my jukebox, the routing will just work regardless of which
> AP I'm currently connected to. With ULA's, not so much. That's hardly a 
> non-sequitur.

You appear to have some misconceptions both about how IP routing works and how 
streaming works.

Suppose you are connected to your homenet.   You are streaming video from your 
jukebox using your ULA.   Now your device switches to your neighbor's Wifi, 
which is advertising a different GUA and a different ULA.   At this point your 
device does a flash renumber because it realizes it's no longer on the same 
network, and that the prefixes it had are no longer valid.

At this point, your application should get a notification from the stack that 
the connection has broken, at which point it should reconnect to your jukebox.  
Supposing that your jukebox is reachable from the outside, the ULA that your 
neighbor's WiFi is advertising won't match the ULA your jukebox is advertising, 
so your device will attempt to reconnect using a GUA, not a ULA.

So whether you have a ULA on your homenet or not, two things will be true.  
First, if your app isn't smart enough to re-connect, your stream will die.   
Second, if it is smart enough, then it will succeed in reconnecting, whether 
you have a ULA configured on your homenet or not.

This is why I say that the concern you have raised is a non-sequitur.

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to