On Oct 16, 2014, at 10:18 AM 10/16/14, Lorenzo Colitti <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote: > On Oct 16, 2014, at 9:08 AM, Lorenzo Colitti <[email protected]> wrote: > > Um, no? Why would it? > > Because that's an indication that there is new information to be had. > > So every time a new prefix comes in, hosts should restart DHCPv6? That seems > pretty dubious (and expensive). Dubious? Perhaps. I don't know of any specification that suggests sending an Information-request message upon receipt of information about a new prefix or prefixes. Expensive? Can you prove "expensive"? In my opinion and experience, this claim is more FUD about how "expensive" DHCPv6 is. Way off course for this discussion? Almost certainly. - Ralph > I don't think any DHCP implementation works that way. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
