On Oct 17, 2014, at 2:49 PM, James Woodyatt <[email protected]> wrote: > As I recall, the proposals in your response were less than concrete and > didn't solve the problems. In particular, I remain curious about how to > expire the locally generated ULA prefixes that accumulate over repeated > network joins and splits. I remember explaining how those events could be > rather more frequent than people might be assuming, and that's where the > discourse seemed to stop.
If you don't burn a ULA prefix every time you split and rejoin, then I don't see why there would be any kind of significant growth in prefixes. That's why I suggested the algorithm that I suggested. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
