On Oct 17, 2014, at 9:50 AM, Lorenzo Colitti <[email protected]> wrote: > But you're saying you want ULAs because you want to continue to do what you > were doing yesterday: persistent connections, like SSH and X-windows. I think > you're trying to fix the problem at the wrong layer. But I don't expect we'll > agree with me on that.
The current IP architecture effectively assumes that this gets fixed on layer 3. I agree that this is a problem, but since we don't have a real layer 4 solution, I think it's worth making sure that we make things as stable as we can at layer 3. This does not preclude working on a solution at layer 4. Indeed, there are several people here who think that's important; perhaps you should put your heads together. Nothing gets done until someone does it. But beware: several ships have foundered against these rocks already. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
