On Nov 12, 2014, at 1:03 PM 11/12/14, Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:31:56AM -1000, Ralph Droms wrote: >> Brian - I missed the discussion in homenet, so this reference may have >> already been cited: RFC 6761 >> > > That's the way we register the special use names. What we don't have > is a way, apart from sending a liaison statement, to tell ICANN what > we're planning to do. Thanks - that's an important clarification. > > In this particular case, I think it would be extremely important to > get positive affirmation that ICANN as an organization is in favour of > registering these names for special use, because the names in question > have in fact been applied for and applicants have spent not > inconsiderable money on those applications. Agreed. - Ralph > I'm not convinced that it > would be safe for the IETF to make such a special-use registration at > this point without an explicit declaration from ICANN not only that > they wanted not to delegate for an indeterminate period of time, but > that they would like the special-use registration as well. > > Best regards, > > A > > -- > Andrew Sullivan > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
