Sorry, missed the attachment ;)
Am 16. November 2014 18:40:07 MEZ, schrieb Pierre Pfister <[email protected]>: >> >> >>> Proposal #1 is the later. It’s probably the simplest way of doing >it. >> >> Could you please give a description of proposal #1 and how it works >for the general public here so we are all on the same level? >> > > >Sure, > >See Mark’s mail which started this discussion. There is a pdf >containing the two proposals. > >Proposal #1 defines a new bit in the existing Assigned Prefix TLV, >asking neighboring nodes to inject the prefix in the routing protocol. >We could find other-but-similar ways to do it of course. Define a >dedicated TLV for instance. But I think this proposal is sufficient for >the intended purpose. > > >- Pierre >_______________________________________________ >homenet mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
