On 11/18/14, 1:46 AM, "Teco Boot" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Op 17 nov. 2014, om 17:53 heeft Margaret Wasserman >><[email protected]> het volgende geschreven: >> >> >> On Nov 16, 2014, at 8:44 PM, Teco Boot <[email protected]> wrote: >>> It could be long enough to get in trouble. There could be more than >>>two neighbors, loaded wireless links and jitter (for collision >>>avoidance) or loss for routing packets. >> >> Why would a stub network router be any different, for this, than any >>other router? Are we likely to run into these problems whenever a >>router that is connected to more than one peer goes away? > >The link state protocols may have loops during convergence. Babel has >not. I had babel in mind here. What feature of babel keeps traffic from looping during re-convergence? Thanks, Acee > >If we include 1. low probability on routing loops and 2. optimized for >wireless links, including wireless mesh on the RP requirement list, I am >fine. > >Teco > > > >> Margaret >> >> > >_______________________________________________ >homenet mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
