Hi Juliusz, 
I think I understand.  If there is the potential for a loop (advertised 
distance >= babel router’s former distance), babel will wait for the next 
sequenced route from the source. So, the loop-free guarantee is at the expense 
of potentially faster convergence. Correct? 
Thanks,
Acee

On Nov 18, 2014, at 10:12 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek 
<[email protected]> wrote:

>> What feature of babel keeps traffic from looping during re-convergence?
> 
> Please see
> 
>  http://www.pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr/~jch/software/babel/babel-20140311.pdf
> 
> slides 7 and 11-17.  I'll be more than happy to clarify anything that's
> not obvious from the slides.
> 
> -- Juliusz

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to