On Feb 19, 2015, at 10:41 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <[email protected]> wrote: > Really? Then you and me have fundamental difference in opinion what > topologies we want to see in homenet. I want to see fewer broadcast domains. > If we're going to keep the large L2 domains, then we don't really need > homenet at all. The only reason to have homenet is if you're going to have a > substantial amount of routers in arbitrary topology, that actually route. If > we want to L2 switch most traffic, then we have made homenet unncessarily > complex.
So you are, I assume, advocating that all in-home switches also have one subnet per port? I have a 16-port switch, and will probably have to add another, so that's going to consume a lot of prefixes. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
