> On 21 Feb 2015, at 16:06 , Juliusz Chroboczek > <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> The client is running a stub implementation of the routing protocol. > >> I thought we already had decided we didn't require changes to the host? > > We don't *require* changes to the host. We propose optional host > modifications that improve the user experience.
exactly. you aren't going to have much fun with multi-prefix multi-homing without host changes anyhow. > The chairs will correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe this is consistent > with Homenet's charter. cheers, Ole
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
