On Mon, 23 Feb 2015, Ole Troan wrote:
On 21 Feb 2015, at 16:06 , Juliusz Chroboczek <[email protected]>
wrote:
The client is running a stub implementation of the routing protocol.
I thought we already had decided we didn't require changes to the host?
We don't *require* changes to the host. We propose optional host
modifications that improve the user experience.
exactly.
you aren't going to have much fun with multi-prefix multi-homing without host
changes anyhow.
Let me get this straight: So the proposal is that end systems will have to
change their IPv6 address when it moves between wifi APs if it's a current
end system, and in order to keep its address, it needs to start to speak
HNCP?
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
