On Mar 3, 2015, at 11:42 AM, Ray Hunter <[email protected]> wrote: > I think caching in the name/address space sets a much more relevant lower > limit on the speed of renumbering/ roaming via L3 on wifi/ whatever other > event that causes your host's address(es) to change. > > Otherwise you're forced into either taking your L3 prefix with you and using > routing to the end host, or NATting the old address, or using rendezvous > points, or being able to deprecate cache contents. None of which have proven > particularly practicable. > > So your 1 hour flash renumbering event seems way too small IMHO. 36 hours > would see
Why do you say that? Is a ~60 minute TTL too short for a home device? I don't think so. As soon as the old address is deprecated, you remove the record pointing to it--you don't keep it around. You install AAAA records only for non-deprecated addresses. Why is this a problem? Why the need for a 36 hour timeframe? _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
