>> Much as I love MPTCP, it only helps TCP sessions. And it requires both >> hosts to >> be updated to be effective. > > IPv6 multi-prefix multi-homing requires both hosts to support it. which means > transport fixes.
to reply to myself. is anyone aware of any document describing the "expectations for hosts / host gaps" with regards to IPv6 multi-prefix multi-homing? including renumbering, mobility, redundancy, load sharing... essentially the RFC3582 goals. cheers, Ole
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
