> The yak we are shaving here, is whether two inter-operable implementations
> leveraging the same mit-licensed source code base (as in the base babeld
> daemon and the quagga implementation) are acceptable to this wg.

Dave,

Alia is right -- there do not at the current time exist two independent
implementations of Babel.

We can argue about whether that is a reasonable requirement, but we cannot
argue about the above, which is a fact.

-- Juliusz

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to