On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> a plan of the form "produce base spec RCC and only then start to think >>>> about security" will get pushback from me. > >>> Why? >>> >>> (If the answer is "read BCP 61", I'll do that, but not right now.) > >> Partly that and partly the horrible experience with years of delay [...] >> until we worked out a plan that was going to not result in security >> being ignored. > > Stephen, everyone, > > I would appreciate an expert opinion on RFC 7298 (HMAC for Babel), perhaps > by private mail.
Trimming the CC. I found RFC7298 to be a very good read, but me being me, found reading the code - which is much shorter - only about 1000 lines, exclusive of the actual implementations of sha1,etc, much more illuminating. https://github.com/Quagga-RE/quagga-RE/blob/RE-stable-0.99/babeld/babel_auth.c > -- Juliusz -- Dave Täht Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again! https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
