On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Markus Stenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > On 26.6.2015 18.41, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> Even implementation isn't limited to it. > >> And sorry if I sound like a broken record, but I would like the ability >> to set up a router-router link with less than a full /64 allocated to >> it, at least in the ad-hoc case. > > > I am not sure about the draft text about what it should say, as non-/64 > seems to be a political hot potato (there are drafts on this too), but at > least the implementation isn't limited to this (given configuration) and the > draft allows for it as well (given configuration). The default of /64 seems > still sane to me though, given no configuration. Regardless of whatever politics of artificial scarcity aligned to wasting 64 bits, 128s are inevitable. > Cheers, > > -Markus > > > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet -- Dave Täht worldwide bufferbloat report: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat And: What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone? https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
