Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: >> ... but I understand your desire to keep RAs off networks where they >> do not belong. Perhaps RAs (and IPv6 prefix allocation) should be >> suppressed on networks on which no IPv6 traffic has been seen, and no >> RSs have ever occured.
> Once IPv4 is put out of its misery, that would be the null set,
> wouldn't it?
Presence of RA(?I think?) or DHCPv6(PD) would cause the network to be seen as
an external network, and would therefore turn off HNCP on that interface.
If some host is sending RSs and there are no RAs in answer, then the network
may be waiting for HNCP to come up and provide service.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
