> yes, sure, IS-IS is great. It does a lot. It would almost certainly work > very nicely in homenet. However, it lacks a feature that the working group > agreed we needed: support for wireless transit networks that might be > lossy. This feature could be added, but is not yet present.
Whatever happens within Homenet, it's good to hear that we've managed to put dynamically computed, unstable metrics on the radar for at least some IETF insiders. The exchange of ideas is also happening in the other direction -- Matthieu and I are going to Battlemesh next week, and we'll be trying to sell the idea of source-specific routing to the community mesh people. (Henning is telling me that he already has an implementation of source-specific routing for OLSRv2, he'll hopefully demo it at Battlemesh.) -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
