> But if we go for IS IS we're apparently going to have to wait (perhaps > forever) to get L3 routing over WIFI working/ stable. Something that we've > pointedly failed to do in professionally managed office networks in the last > 20 years.
What is so unstable about it? I could guess you are referring to the lack of multicast performance over wifi. If not, please be clear about “L3 routing over WIFI working/stable” means. Otherwise, IS-IS will send multicast frames pretty much at the rate that ND would. So I don’t know what the big fuss about how multicast control protocols, in general, don’t work well. Dino _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
