Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote: > You have to decide what your interface damping algorithm is if this > link is not considered down by the implementation. If you can observe > 50% packet loss in a short period of time, the implementation should > take the link down and allow the IGP to converge to a new path.
> If there aren’t enough redundant paths in the home network, then you
> have to live with 50% loss.
> Do you all think hosts will be multi-homed to more than one wifi radio?
Yes, having seperate 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz radios is common.
Historically CPEs have bridged the two, but that isn't a great idea.
(That's why Dave Taht wants you guys to get an OpenWRT device out and try it,
because this kind of thing would be obvious)
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
