On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
thing to implement. I'm trying to understand the use cases, since I have the policy of not implementing anything until it is requested by my users (fewer TLVs = better protocol).
I've been involved in implementing IPv6 for almost 10 years now. If I waited until it became a user requirement I would still have done nothing.
People want "working Internet" and they want us to figure out how to make it work for them without them having to be bothered to actually figure out how things work (too much). If they cobble together their homenet with some cables and someone tells them to put two cables between two equipment, I'd like to see the capacity used.
Do you even need more TLVs? I'm a bit rusty on DV since I've mostly been exposed to OSPF/ISIS and BGP all my life, but all of these can be made to load-share as soon as they discover two paths with identical metrics.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected] _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
