On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:41:24AM +0300, Markus Stenberg wrote:
> Just like in some other old workplace, cough, ???if it does not work without
> IPsec, do not expect it to work with it???.
Should i even try to understand that reference ? ;-)
> I do not expect homenet stuff to do much better here, unless we want to make
> it crazily complicated.
>
> Normal, graceful renumberings are a part of IPv6 and should work equally well
> given single 7084 router and homenet router network. IPv4 ???renumbering???
> will be bit less graceful no matter what, I am afraid, but that???s outside
> the architecture RFC mandate anyway and done just as a public service.
I don't know why Juliusz called stable storage bad. I think it's great.
Where would i be without stable storage for my routers software, policy
configuration, passwords, logs and the like. Why should it be bad to
memorize addressing ? I think it's mandatory for IPv4, and for IPv6,
i'd love to have some option to either re-number when i click - to weed
out bad apps/OS problems - or a switch for persistency of addresses
(one to improve reality, one to live with it).
Cheers
Toerless
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
