Hi Ted,

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Aug 11, 2015, at 7:25 PM, Alia Atlas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It sounds to me like using multiple paths (ECMP or otherwise) is
> something that hasn't been clearly nailed down in the requirements?
>
> Putting ECMP in the requirements seems like a terrible idea.   I don’t
> think there’s a need for it, for two reasons.   First, none of the
> applications you described actually require it.  Yes, you’d get better
> performance if they had it, so it would be a nice value-added feature.
>  But it is not a base requirement for the homenet to function.   Second,
> did you read my description of the typical homenet user’s mental model of
> what a homenet looks like a week ago?   I think this is a key point: the
> end user has no idea what ECMP is, what its operational characteristics
> are, what links it might function over, etc.   So ECMP would have to
> self-configure, and that includes the sort of stuff Juliusz was talking
> about—noticing interfering versus non-interfering paths, etc.   This is a
> research project.   I think it would be great if homenet could do this work
> at some point in the future, but it is not something that should be part of
> the base requirements for the homenet, because if it were, it would delay
> availability of a complete homenet spec by years.
>

ECMP or downstream paths is not a research project; it is common used
technology.  When the traffic streams desired are larger than can fit
across a single path, it becomes critical.

Figuring out how to handle interfering vs. non-interfering paths is, I
think, orthogonal to ECMP.  The multiple links
that might interfere can easily be used for different destinations.  While
interesting, that seems like a problem that can needs
solving already.  Is that piece of the problem a research project?
Figuring out what links interfere?  Is this something that would need
a centralized view of the home network?

>From a user's perspective, use of multiple paths would be transparent -
except that they'd see better performance through
their network.  There can be high-bandwidth demands like data backup or
streaming multiple high-def video.

Regards,
Alia
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to