On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Alia Atlas <[email protected]> wrote: > Ted, I asked a question about a feature that is considered critical in every > routing environment that I am familiar with. > I find it frustrating that looking ahead to significantly more complex home > networking topologies and link types, which may be > many years out still, is unexceptional, but asking about a feature that > allows better use is described as premature optimization. > I am asking about a routing requirement. > > I still am not clear on how link interference is handled for different > destinations.
The options I know are "ignore it" or "include the interference domain size into the link cost". Still, using multipath in wireless environments can be tricky... it is quite easy to mess up even with two paths and get less throughput than from a single path. There is also the point that multipath choices tend not to be isometric... just because the two paths from your local point of view seem to be good they are not necessarily good from the point of view of the next hop. Henning Rogge _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
