On 31.8.2015, at 14.33, Markus Stenberg <markus.stenb...@iki.fi> wrote: > Sure, you can define link segment name election mechanism and use per-link > names (they are even mentioned as an option in > draft-ietf-homenet-stenberg-hybrid-proxy-zeroconf; see also why doing that > zeroconf might be bad idea), but I am not sure it is any cleaner than just > electing single router to be responsible for it and using per-link+router > names. That draft is intentionally NOT referred to in HNCP itself due to > hybrid proxy dependency.
Oho, still had my name there. This is the link, for the record. Seems like it is about to expire too, should probably nop-republish it (for Nth time; I think substantial changes to the draft were 2-3 years ago). https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-homenet-hybrid-proxy-zeroconf-00.txt -Markus _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
