On Wed, 30 Sep 2015, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
We've been through that already, haven't we? Homenet uses the classical prefix model, which is easier on the routing protocol (it's more restrictive). We've been doing all of our testing in the more hostile mesh environment, so you'll need to design a different set of tests for IS-IS.
Since the homenet I envision would have AP(s) and then perhaps some other routers who would be in client mode towards this AP, a valid test of the metric setting features would be to have two wifi networks, one 2.4GHz, one 5Ghz, two different L2s, different IP networks, and then walk around with two clients connected together with a network cable, and check if the routing would change from the 5GHz network to the 2.4GHz network as distance from the AP increases and the 5GHz network stops working.
So since we have different opinions on what a homenet looks like, does anyone believe that this test is worthless, or does it at least give some valuable data?
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected] _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
