In message <[email protected]>, Juliusz Chroboczek wri tes: > > So what is the scope of the request and what needs to be simulated? > > There are two distinct requests here: > > 1. have the IETF DHCPv6 servers delegate a /60 (at least) to any client > that requests it;
Sounds like you want the IETF to simulate being a WISP. I suggest that you write down the complete plan and submit it to Jim Martin [email protected] so the noc team can plan for it. Jim will let you know if you need to ask elsewhere. I can see several ways to do this each with its own tradeoffs and levels of noc support and preparation. e.g. >From a Linux/BSD box and switch you supply w/ /44 from the noc, a DHCPv6 server and the DHCPv6 server just updating the routing table on the host. The noc just supplies a port for the upstream connection and the address block. Through to it being supported on all the ssids. > 2. have the hnetd software automatically deal with the situation in which > no DHCPv6 server performs prefix delegation by doing Proxy-ND or > something equally hackish. > > Request (1) comes from Toerless. Request (2) comes from me, and, as noted > Gabriel, probably reflects a typically European point of view (since > a number of ISPs provide native-ish IPv6 but don't do PD). The two > requests are not incompatible. > > -- Juliusz -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected] _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
