Mark Andrews writes: > > In message <[email protected]>, Juliusz Chroboczek w > ri > tes: > > > So what is the scope of the request and what needs to be simulated? > > > > There are two distinct requests here: > > > > 1. have the IETF DHCPv6 servers delegate a /60 (at least) to any client > > that requests it; > > Sounds like you want the IETF to simulate being a WISP. I suggest > that you write down the complete plan and submit it to Jim Martin > [email protected] so the noc team can plan for it. Jim will let you > know if you need to ask elsewhere. I can see several ways to do > this each with its own tradeoffs and levels of noc support and > preparation. > > e.g. > > From a Linux/BSD box and switch you supply w/ /44 from the noc, a
I meant a /52 which would give you 256 /60's to play with. > DHCPv6 server and the DHCPv6 server just updating the routing table > on the host. The noc just supplies a port for the upstream connection > and the address block. Through to it being supported on all the > ssids. > > > 2. have the hnetd software automatically deal with the situation in which > > no DHCPv6 server performs prefix delegation by doing Proxy-ND or > > something equally hackish. > > > > Request (1) comes from Toerless. Request (2) comes from me, and, as noted > > Gabriel, probably reflects a typically European point of view (since > > a number of ISPs provide native-ish IPv6 but don't do PD). The two > > requests are not incompatible. > > > > -- Juliusz > -- > Mark Andrews, ISC > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected] -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected] _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
