If devices publish keys, then you can use those keys to make sure you are still talking to them. And the dnssec validation of local names would also work. Graceful renumbering should indeed result in DNS updates. Bear in mind that this is graceful, so the old and new ULAs coexist for a while. On May 13, 2016 06:45, "Ray Hunter (v6ops)" <[email protected]> wrote:
Ted Lemon <[email protected]> 12 May 2016 15:48 As long as the renumbering process is clean, there is no downside to renumbering, and no reason to be careful about which ULA you ultimately wind up with. So are you suggesting the Homenet (internal) namespace should be independent of ULA address space? In which case 1) how do we avoid the ".local" security problem where mobile devices are unable to distinguish whether they've actually moved to a different Homenet, or whether they've stayed still and their own Homenet has just renumbered. Or else 2) Does the renumbering mechanism also trigger an automatic renaming too? -- regards, RayH <https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=siglink&utm_campaign=reach>
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
