On 09/06/2016 16:17, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> I've just fixed shncpd so that it interoperates with hnetd again (by > following the IANA registry). But what's to be done longer term? Do we > change the IANA registry again, or should somebody publish an erratum to > RFC 7788. To clarify for other readers, since it's hard to spot - the IANA registry reflects what was specified in the IANA Considerations of the document, but the diagrams in §10.2.2 and §10.2.3 have the option values the wrong way around. So yes, we should probably publish an erratum, but please leave it with the Chairs and our AD for a short while. Per the errata already raised regarding the unintended de-facto reservation of ".home" for HNCP we're expecting to need to put out a 7788-bis very soon anyway. thanks, Ray _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
