Thanks Ray, I would also like the WG to read this draft before entering the discussion on this topic.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-stw-whatsinaname While currently a -00 individual submission there is some very good guidance in this document that might help frame everyone's thoughts. Thanks Terry On 16/07/2016, 5:42 PM, "homenet on behalf of Ray Bellis" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >The Chairs have been asked to forward this to the WG on behalf of the IAB: > >--8<--8<-- > >The IAB discussed RFC 7788 and the appearance of the domain ".home" in >the RFC. The IAB was happy to see that an appropriate erratum has been >filed and approved, observing the problem with RFC 7788 and publishing a >fix for the error. The original text in the RFC is problematic, because >the use of .home in this case would constitute use of .home as a Special >Use Name, but there is no text in RFC 7788 following the process in >section 5 of RFC 6761 and no IANA Considerations updating the Special >Use Names registry. > >The IAB requests that the homenet WG and the IESG follow up on the >publication of the erratum for RFC 7788 with the re-approval of the RFC >with a fix as quickly as possible. The IAB feels strongly that a >correct, formal RFC is required immediately to avoid any further >problems. Also, sending a timely note to the implementors known to be >interested in HOMENET may be useful. > >The IAB considers the existence of RFC 7788 in its current state to be >problematic for two reasons: the specification of home in an IETF >document without following the appropriate RFC 6761 process may result >in other organizations pointing out that the IETF can't even follow its >own processes with regard to Special Use Names; and encoding .home as >the default in implementations may result in embedding this >inappropriate use of .home in deployed products.] > >--8<--8<-- > >There is some time set aside on our agenda on Monday for Jari to speak >about this. > >In the meantime, please note that the RFC 7788 authors have filed a -bis >draft (draft-ietf-homenet-hncp-bis-00). > >thanks, > >Ray and Mark > >_______________________________________________ >homenet mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
