On 19/07/2016 03:40, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > >> Doing so for .home. would be entertaining, of course. Doing so for .homenet. >> seems plausible. > > It seems to already be used for that, and as said before, ICANN has refused > all applications for .home already. > > .home is tainted by ad-hoc use. The ad-hoc use seems to be exactly the same > use as RFC7788 uses it for. > > Why not formalise it?
To be blunt, because ICANN and possibly the IETF would get sued for many M$. Brian _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
