On 23/07/2016 11:28, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > Speaking with people at this week's IETF meeting, I've realised that some > are confused about why configuration and routing are implemented by > different protocols in Homenet. Contrary to what might seem, this is not > some sort of weird political compromise, but a conscious technical > decision.
... > Please let me know if you're still unconvinced. I love arguing. You are 100% correct. They should be separately pluggable, in fact, in case either of the current choices proves to be a mistake later on. (Some people may recall that I used homenet as a use case in the UCAN BOF that preceded the Anima working group. I wish I had articulated it as clearly as Juliusz has done in the text deleted above. It will be an interesting exercise, once Anima has done its work, to check that it would in fact work for a homenet, although its style would be very different from HNCP.) Brian _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
