On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 23 Jul 2016, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > >> Please let me know if you're still unconvinced. I love arguing. > > Well, in my testing I got the feeling (hard to tell since it was really hard > to get a comprehensive picture of what was going on over time), that > sometimes HNCP lost its connection to other HNCP nodes on the lan, while > babel was still working, and the other way around, babel went down and HNCP > was up.
I wonder if HNCP could have a local "port" where a routing protocol could deliver the information that a certain linklocal neighbor address is still reachable. HNCP would still do its own neighbor detection, but it could take advantage of the (regularly happening) checks of the links of the routing. Henning Rogge _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
