On Jul 31, 2017, at 3:22 PM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: > So the plumbing/protocols all do work if you have a name and > address that works from the CA service provider POV. It's just > that almost nobody can do that today. > > Is this something where it'd be worth trying to get a few folks > from the various communities on a call to see if we can come up > with something that might work for the openwrt/lede type cases?
Yes. I actually suggested a design for solving this problem in an earlier version of the homenet naming architecture document: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lemon-homenet-naming-architecture-00#section-4 I took this out in the -01 document because I was specifying something that probably ought to be specified in a different document—I just wanted to get it out there so that it wouldn't get patented. I think this is something that could be done on a demonstration basis right now (modulo figuring out all the steps in the process, which I just sketched). _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
