Why do you want it to be optional? What problem are you trying to solve? Do you not know how to do it? Do you think it's resource intensive? Do you think it reduces reliability more than not doing it?
On Aug 11, 2017 8:55 AM, "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <[email protected]> wrote: > Ted Lemon <[email protected]> writes: > > > How does the client know in which PvD a response is intended to exist. > > Well, in some cases normal source address selection rules are going to > do the trick (i.e., the client picks the source address closest to the > destination). In others it won't, and the client will get degraded > behaviour. > > > Also, what problem are you trying to solve here? What you described > > sounds like it's just an attempt at implementing mpvd on a homenet > > without requiring that all routers behave the same. > > Well, as I said I would be perfectly happy to just ignore the MPvD issue > entirely. What I'm trying to do is at least make it optional for a > homenet router to implement it... :) > > -Toke >
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
