> 1a. Router A exports over HNCP that it supports MPvD. Router B forwards > all queries to router A, using a source address in the same prefix > as the original request was received from.
> 1b. Router A exports over HNCP that it supports MPvD. Router B uses > router A's address (which would need to be routable inside the > homenet, obviously) as the DNS server in RAs. This has the significant advantage of not requiring a DNS proxy on each Homenet router. It has the disadvantage of not requiring a DNS proxy on each Homenet router. I like it. (Aside: what's the fallback mode if there's no A in the network? One could either advertise all of the ISPs' DNS servers in RAs, or advertise oneself notwithstanding no support for MPvD. I guess both should be allowed.) (Second aside: what happens when there are multiple As in the network? One could either elect the "master" DNS server, so that all links use the same DNS proxy, or let each router pick one at random, so you get load balancing. I guess only one should be allowed.) -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet