El 16 ag 2017, a les 9:40, Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> va escriure: > Ah, if this is your concern, I think that's answered by the whitelisting > stuff I was talking about earlier. But in this case you really do need to > have separate caches per PvD, and the MPvD-aware clients on the net need to > be able to use them. We could say that this is optional to support, though, > and so if you want to pay for one router with this feature, that router's > resolver can be advertised in the PvD-aware path.
BTW, I think we have probably carried this discussion as far as is useful until a new rev of the draft is done. Daniel is working on a new draft, he said, and when he's done his bit I'll do a pass as well and try to capture the changes we've discussed here, and then we can iterate again. :)
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
