What dnsmasq seems to be doing is trying all servers at once. That would work too, if the pattern described in the document is followed.
On Aug 11, 2017 8:41 AM, "Juliusz Chroboczek" <j...@irif.fr> wrote: > > - round-robin = bad (think why happy eyeballs came up for example of > why) > > > DNS resolvers use round-robining. That's how the protocol works. > > Does that mean that dnsmasq breaks the protocol? > > http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=blob;f=src/forward.c;h= > f22556a595673c7478706f17a22af2095e1068f8;hb=HEAD#l366 > > -- Juliusz >
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet