What dnsmasq seems to be doing is trying all servers at once. That would
work too, if the pattern described in the document is followed.

On Aug 11, 2017 8:41 AM, "Juliusz Chroboczek" <j...@irif.fr> wrote:

> >     - round-robin = bad (think why happy eyeballs came up for example of
> why)
>
> > DNS resolvers use round-robining. That's how the protocol works.
>
> Does that mean that dnsmasq breaks the protocol?
>
>   http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=blob;f=src/forward.c;h=
> f22556a595673c7478706f17a22af2095e1068f8;hb=HEAD#l366
>
> -- Juliusz
>
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to